Home  Contact Us  About Us  FAQ
Pages >   
 

Home
About Us
Practice Areas
Profiles
Verdicts & Settlements
News & Articles
Q & A's
Contact

Read The Weekly Newsletter

 
   

Verdicts & Settlements

Below is a representation of the various types of cases we have either won verdicts on, or obtain settlements in behalf of our clients.

 


 

 

 

 


Dantas v. XYZ Hospital and Dr. John Doe. (1995) (Drug overdose)
A 34 year old female died while being treated by the defendant doctor from an overdose of chemotherapy. The defendant oncologist made an arithmetic error and then wrote orders for the decedent to receive four times the required amount of a potent chemotherapeutic agent. One nurse at the defendant hospital questioned the amount of the dosage to be administered, but did not have the orders in front of her when she spoke to the defendant doctor. The hospital pharmacist alleged that they tried to reach the oncologist to question the order before sending the medication to the nursing unit, but the doctor did not return their calls. Plaintiff's expert nurse described the decedent's multiple episodes of nausea and vomiting during administration of the chemotherapy that were charted in the records. The oncologist stated, "the patient tolerated her therapy superbly well and had absolutely no complaints." Three days after the conclusion of the chemotherapy, the decedent was readmitted to the hospital with complaints of poor appetite, difficulty swallowing, nausea, vomiting and sore mouth. Three days later she was transferred to intensive care with bleeding from her eyes, mouth and gastrointestinal tract and massive diarrhea. Her skin blistered and peeled off her body in many places. She also cried on slight touch or movement. Only 13 doses of pain medication could be given because her blood pressure was too low. She died 11 days after admission. The parties disputed the decedent's chances of survival with the defense arguing that it was 35% and the plaintiff maintaining a 65% chance of survival. Settlement was reached on the day of trial on behalf of the plaintiff, decedent's husband for 1.3 Million Dollars including a structured settlement for plaintiff's children, 16 and 19 with a total payout of 4 Million Dollars.

TOP

 

Simeone v. Dr. X (1981) (Cancer - Delay in Diagnosis)
This was a case involving a 34-year-old male who went to a doctor for a circumcision. The urologist who circumcised the plaintiff noted a small wart on plaintiff's penis. The wart was excised and a biopsy was performed. Plaintiff went back to his family doctor. His family doctor neglected to order a follow up biopsy in 6 weeks. The pathologist misread the pathology slides and the pathology slides showed a cancer. It was contended by the plaintiff, Simeone that the pathologist had deviated from accepted standards in misreading the pathology slides and that the family doctor had deviated from accepted standards of care in not sending the plaintiff back for a re-biopsy in 6 weeks. The defense contended that the pathology slides were read appropriately, that the family physician had acted in accordance with accepted standards of medical care and that in any event it made absolutely no difference because the plaintiff's injury was unavoidable. The plaintiff sustained an amputation of his penis. Plaintiff Simeone authorized Larry L. Leifer to settle case for $90,000.00 At the time of trial the matter was settled for $280,000.00

TOP

 

DeVito v. Dr. Y (1983) (General Surgery)
This was a medical malpractice case settled shortly before trial in 1983. Theresa DeVito's life had been saved by Dr. Y on one occasion when he performed an emergency tracheotomy. Subsequently, the plaintiff was scheduled for elective surgery and Dr. Y was called upon to perform a temporary tracheotomy because Theresa DeVito had a very small short neck and difficulty breathing which constituted an intubation risk and required a tracheotomy. Defendant, Dr. Y, it was alleged, performed the temporary tracheotomy at to high a site and plaintiff, Theresa DeVito went on to suffer from tracheostenosis, multiple subsequent hospitalizations and ended up with a permanent metal tube in her throat. She ultimately died from a lack of ability to breathe some 10 years after the case settled. The settlement was reached on the eve of trial and was a structured settlement with a payout over Theresa DeVito's lifetime and her surviving family members in the amount of approximately 4 Million Dollars.

TOP

 

Rose v. Dr. Z (1985) (Orthopedic Malpractice)
$425,000.00 verdict in a medical malpractice matter involving alleged multiple deviations in treating a femur fractured as a result of a motorcycle accident resulting in a 2 inch shortening of the leg. This was a medical malpractice action in which the 33 year old plaintiff who suffered a fracture of the femur in a motorcycle accident contended that the defendant orthopedic surgeon negligently failed to utilize a drill to ream out the intramedulary canal before inserting a Hanson-Street intramedulary nail, resulting in the nail exerting excessive pressure on the fracture causing a large butterfly fragment to exude from the fracture site which resulted in the non-union and the significant shortening of the leg. Plaintiff, Rose further contended that the defendant failed to measure the intramedulary shaft prior to the insertion of the nail and thereby probably utilized a nail which was excessively large for the plaintiff’s canal, causing the split to widen. Additionally, the plaintiff contended that the defendant failed to take appropriate action to treat the butterfly fragment by either inserting a simple screw or utilizing a wire to keep the fragment in place contributing to the non-union. The plaintiff had also suffered a fracture of the lower portion of the patella and the plaintiff further contended that the defendant deviated in failing to treat this fracture for 75 days following the accident, causing permanent instability in the knee. Finally, the plaintiff contended that the defendant departed from accepted standards of care in advising the plaintiff to place weight on the leg when x-rays revealed insufficient union to justify such a course of action.

 

TOP

 

Garcia v. Dr. Jones, (1982) (ENT Surgery)
Settlement on the eve of trial for $250,000.00 for the partial paralysis of Mrs. Garcia, who sustained nerve damage during tumor excision surgery. Mrs. Garcia consulted defendant, ear, nose and throat specialist, Dr. Jones for what she thought was a cyst on her neck. Defendant, Dr. Jones diagnosed a tumor and performed excision surgery following which plaintiff experienced severe pain and was unable to use her left arm and hand. Plaintiffs condition was later diagnosed as brachial plexus paralysis due to nerve root damage. Plaintiff brought suit alleging unnecessary excision of a slow growing tumor, causing significant impairment, negligent failure to recognize nerve involvement before or during surgery and failure to consult a neurosurgeon. Plaintiff, Irma Garcia authorized settlement in the amount of $250,000.00.

 

TOP

 

Dana Sedares v. Dr. Bowers (1993) (Breast Cancer)
This was a breast cancer medical malpractice case in which the plaintiff, Dana Sedares came under the care of 2 treating gynecologists, Dr. Pinderhuges and Dr. Bowers. She treated with them regularly. Ultimately a small lump on the breast was diagnosed. Plaintiff was only 27 years old at the time. Plaintiff alleged that defendant, Dr. Bowers deviated by following the lump over a period of months and not sending her for a biopsy. Dr. Bowers contended that plaintiff was too young to fall into the statistical risk category for breast cancer, and that the growth did not increase in size. Ultimately he left it up to the plaintiff to decide whether she wanted to go for a biopsy or not. The defendant also defended on the basis that the type of tumor plaintiff had indicated that it made no difference when the biopsy was done and when the mastectomy was performed. Ultimately, plaintiff was diagnosed with a breast cancer by biopsy which required a mastectomy. She died at age 31 of metastatic breast cancer leaving her husband, who had married her 3 weeks before the diagnosis of breast cancer was made. Settlement was achieved in the amount of $580,000.00.

TOP

 

Trudy Natapoff v. Dr. Z (1998) (Breast Cancer)
Trudy Natapoff was a 78 year old woman who treated with her family doctor for suspected breast cancer. She went to Dr. Z with a lump on her breast and he ordered a mammogram. The mammogram report came back to Dr. Z’s office “suspicious for cancer”. Dr. Z neglected to contact Trudy Natapoff. Ultimately, she went back to Dr. Z for another general check up 7 months later and he advised her at that time that she should consult with a breast surgeon for possible breast cancer. The defendant defended the matter on the basis that the type of cancer Trudy Natapoff had made no difference in terms of the ultimate diagnosis and possibility of cure and that in any event the likelihood of a cure was only in the 30% range. At age 80 Trudy Natapoff authorized settlement of the matter in the amount of $300,000.00. She died a year later.

TOP

 

Castaneda v. Turk (Oral Surgery) (1998)
This was a oral surgery malpractice case in which the plaintiff, Mrs. Castaneda was involved in a motor vehicle accident. Ultimately, she came under the care of Dr. Turk who held himself out as a specialist in the field of tempo-mandibular surgery. Dr. Turk performed 3 surgeries in the tempo-mandibular area and ultimately replaced Helen Castandeda tempo-mandibular joints on both sides of her jaw. Helen Castandeda suffered from partial paralysis of the face, partial paralysis of the eyelid and an inability to manipulate her jaw in an appropriate manner so she could eat. She also claimed lack of informed consent. Defendant, Dr. Turk defended the matter on the basis that he had not deviated from accepted standards of care, that in fact the surgery was necessary, and, that there were no specific standards by which he could be governed in terms of his choice of tempo mandibular surgery. Ultimately, the matter was settled at the time of trial for the sum of $750,000.00.

TOP

 

Annette Howard v Roselle Trucking Co. (1999)
(Motor Vehicle Accident)
This was a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff, Annette Howard was a passenger in a van along with 8 other people. The van was proceeding to take Annette Howard to a nursing home in Andover, New Jersey where she performed services as a practical nurse. The van was proceeding along Prospect Avenue at the Montclair Country Club in West Orange when a garbage truck owned and operated by Roselle Trucking Company made a sudden left hand turn in front of the van. The van collided with the garbage truck. All of the passengers and the driver of the van were injured. Annette Howard sustained a badly fractured pinkie, a fractured right wrist, a fracture of the orbit of the right eye and mild brain damage. She was in the hospital 10 days. She consulted with numerous doctors. A year later she was back at work full time as a medication nurse. The following year she had a new born baby. In all respects she appeared “normal” her only “visible injury” was a badly fractured pinkie. The case settled for $487,500.00 at the time of trial.

TOP

 

George Radino v. Dr. Z, (1999) (Orthopedic Malpractice)
This was an orthopedic medical malpractice case. Plaintiff, George Radino consulted Dr. Z in regard to back and leg pain. Dr. Z diagnosed George Radino with a bilateral hip condition which required bilateral artificial hip replacements. Dr. Z proceeded to perform surgery on both hips on separate occasions and placed hip prosthesis in George Radino’s hips. George Radino ended up with a limping gait and an inability to participate in sporting activities such as golf. He also lost a short time from work. Ultimately, the hip replacements had to be replaced on both hips. At the time of trial, George Radino authorized settlement against Dr. Z in the amount of $300,000.00.

TOP

Sara Hovich vs. Dr. M (2001) (Podiatry) $550,000
case settled on the fourth day of trial. Podiatrist did not properly remove neuroma. Patient went on to develop reflex sympathetic dystrophy, multiple surgeries - doctor had altered records. Union County New Jersey.

TOP

Sydmouth Berwick - 2001 - Gastroenterology / Colon cancer
case settled shortly before trial for $600,000. Defendant gastroenterologist did not perform appropriate colonoscopy in face of obvious symptoms of potential colon cancer. Patient ultimately died.  Essex County, N.J.

TOP

A. Califano - 2002 - hospital negligence
multiple disciplines involved including internists, cardiologists -case settled at trial for $600,000.  various doctors failed to supply needed potassium supplements to cardiac patient who had ulcerative colitis - patient passed away after ten day hospitalization due to lack of potassium and cardiac event triggered by lack of potassium. (Middlesex County - New Jersey.)

TOP

Jean DelPriore - 2002 - gynecology - settled shortly before trial for $275,000. Inappropriate post operative care following gynecologic surgery lead to massive infection.  Bergen County, N.J.

TOP

Mary Gallagher - 2003 - gynecology - cancer
settled shortly before trial for $175,000. Failure to make appropriate diagnosis of cancer of the cervix lead to increased severity of cancer. Essex County New Jersey.

TOP

Lovella Rushing - 2003 - neurology - stroke -
settled for $600,000 shortly before trial - plaintiff had multiple symptoms including the worst headache of her life and went back to a University Hospital on three separate occasions. University doctors failed to make appropriate diagnosis of pending stroke resulting in cerebral stroke and brain damage. Essex County New Jersey.

TOP

F. Diakos vs. Ferarra - 2004 - Drugs - pharmacy error.
Patient had breast cancer; patient was on Tomaxafin for five years. Doctor wrote prescription for substitute Femora tablets to replace Tomaxafin. Pharmacist dispensed Premarin tablets instead. Patient almost hemorrhaged to death and is at increased risk of recurrence of cancer. Settled shortly before trial for $150,000. Essex County.

TOP

Edgar Seabron 2004 - - ophthalmology
prescription error, settled shortly before trial $300,000. Edgar Seabron suffered from asthma and beta blockers were contraindicated.  Ophthalmologist dispensed drugs containing beta blocker to be administered into the eyes. Drug was administered into the eyes and patient suffered period of unconsciousness for five days and suffered mild stroke - Essex County.

TOP

Tyquan Gray - 2004 - obstetrics/birth injury/cerebral palsy
brain damaged infant case. Available coverage: $2,260,000. Case settled for $2,250,000 including structured settlement worth in excess of $9 million dollars - Essex County New Jersey.

TOP

Janet Schwartz vs. Sulzer Hip Replacement - 2004 -Product Liability Case.
Case has settled so far for $250,000 additional money forthcoming. Part of a class action lawsuit. Janet Schwartz had a Suizer Hip Replacement which was defective and suffered multiple hip displacements with multiple hip replacements.  Bergen County New Jersey.

TOP

Deborah President - 2004 -  obstetrics/eclampsia
case originally involved obstetrics and sending a patient home from the hospital who was pregnant who had signs and symptoms of pregnancy induced hypertension. (eclampsia) Doctor allegedly had no insurance coverage at time of incident in question. Case went up to the New Jersey Supreme Court on insurance issue questions. It was ultimately resolved between plaintiff and pre date of tort and post date of tort insurance carriers for $400,000. Union County New Jersey.

TOP

Kevin Wilkes - 2004 - internal medicine/nephrology
loss of two kidneys. This case settled for $800,000-Burlington County. Case involved an African American male who was treated by a family doctor over a two year period of time with increasing signs and symptoms of hyper-tension induced kidney failure. Doctor failed to make an appropriate referral. Case was originally rejected by a previous law firm for comparative negligence. Case settled shortly before trial for $800,000.

TOP

Rhoda Smith - 2004 - obstetrics - $490,000 - Union County.
Case involved pregnancy breech presentation vaginal delivery with a fourth degree laceration which resulted in patient becoming fecally incontinent. Case settled shortly before trial.

TOP

Julio Romero - 2004 - gastroenterology-liver biopsy
case settled in Hudson County shortly before trial for $300,000. Case involved Mr. Romero who was HIV positive, he was a drug counselor, he went in for a liver biopsy because of increasing liver problems, he bled to death as a result of the liver biopsy and the failure of the treating gastroenterologist to appropriately respond to the bleeding. Hudson County New Jersey.

TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     
Professional, Individualized and Aggressive Representation

1-877- 587-8423 / 973-763-8555                                                       Case Inquiry Form